We Are (More Than) The Mammoths, by Natalia Khoudian ’20

“We are the Mammoths!” has been the main headline on the Amherst homepage this week, leaving many elated, some horrified, others indifferent, and yet most are just relieved that the college finally has a tangible mascot to rally around (and I am among them). To the majority of those in the Amherst community, this year-long process to adopt a new mascot may have seemed slow, even awkward at times when my friends from back home would ask me what my school’s mascot is. I finally will be able to say “Mammoths” instead of “we’re working on it.”

However, behind the scenes, for the committee of 10 alumni and 10 students, the timing to narrow down the choices and move the votes along was a dynamic working process. After the suggestions were collected from the community in the fall, the committee spent several conference calls discussing and subsequently narrowing down the suggestions to 30 semifinalists. These were then narrowed down to the final five in a big meeting based on alumni and student delegate feedback, which were voted on by the community. And now we’ve got the Mammoths!

I spoke with one of the heads of the student committee, Alejandro Nino Quintero, to ask him more about his overall impression of the process:

“Overall I think it was really fair and transparent. I don’t think anyone in the community can say that we weren’t mostly clear in our communication, and that overall if there was a way to narrow down some 500 something options to 1, I think we really made sure we were taking the community’s voice into account, not just choosing a mascot. And so I think having that kind of traditional role of an arbiter is the most important thing to make a process like that succeed.”

When asked what he would want to share to someone at another college undergoing a similar mascot project, Quintero puts it, “I think the process is only as good as the suggestions you have. If you don’t have much interest towards the beginning, then when you’re actually getting down to the final choices you end up with people either rejecting the process or feeling particularly unexcited. ” Per the Amherst website, “There were 2046 total suggestions, 588 of those were unique.…. Class years for alumni and students [who submitted suggestions] range from 1942 – 2020.”

As a new member of the committee this year, I did more than just help narrow down suggestions and meet with the committee—a key part of my job was to help the student momentum not die down in the lulls of time when there was no result coming out of the mascot process. This included lots of tabling in Val, pestering my friends to suggest mascots, and giving away about 2000 purple plastic cups with a question mark stamped on them. Even though there are far fewer students than alumni, the student momentum felt to me a very important part of moving the process along. Without student excitement for a new mascot, adopting a new mascot into the Amherst culture for years to come would not be legitimate.

While it can be expected that the alumni were the most upset by the process of adopting a new mascot just after Lord Jeff was voted out, they can’t complain about not being included. 23,865 alumni were eligible for an equally weighted vote alongside the students, whose total population is only 1,898. When asked about something that could have been done differently in the process, Quintero’s main point emphasized the committee’s structuring of the final vote, saying, “Every vote counts the same, when students are the ones who are reshaping the culture and at the present moment, and the school is kind of in that sense theirs.” Quintero doesn’t disregard the importance of the alumni voice, but notes the final vote could essentially have been dictated by the sheer number of alumni.

So, why the mammoths? More specifically, why did mammoths win over purple and white, even though we saw a lot of general support for P&W from the alumni? Quintero explains, “I don’t think there’s a clear answer to that. I mean for one thing, you can’t really homogenize that entire group, to say ‘All the alumni like purple and white.’ It was a dominant narrative among some of the class groups. But, as mentioned, even just across the ages we were getting a pretty broad spectrum of choices and that really shows in the data, you know, it wasn’t like there was one runaway winner.” Purple and White received 4,134 (48.69%) votes, only 222 votes and 2.62% behind the winning Mammoths. Quintero notes that “[Mammoths] also stood strong against purple and white because it was tied to the college’s history, but it was a bit more exciting for a lot people.”

I have spoken with individual students who have said they voted for the Mammoths, but not because it particularly resonated with them: it was simply their preferred choice in the final 5. I suppose this is better than not voting at all, but we hope that Mammoths will be something to resonate with every student one day. Sure, saying “Amherst Mammoths” is a mouthful, but students can collectively laugh at the quirky mascot that is strong and powerful, but also shaggy haired and awkward. In the final question for Quintero, I asked him what will be essential in the coming years to get the community, primarily the students on campus, excited about Mammoths.

“… branding is the most important next step, and really making sure alumni and students have a lot of voice in what that looks like. Because I think alumni and students are going to be the ones often wearing it on their shirts or trying to identify with it.” Quintero believes the creativity and passions students have for the new mascot–such as one person he mentioned who wanted to create a two-person costume–will ultimately be what allows the Mammoth to grow as part of the culture.

Though a new mascot has been officially adopted, it is no secret that many among the alumni have shown strong disdain towards Amherst for getting rid of Lord Jeff. However, this is a college, meaning students cycle out every 4 years. The needs of a student body change over time. The alums should love this school because of their education here, the friends they made, amongst many other factors. The Lord Jeff mascot may have been an integral part of their college experience–as we hope the Mammoths will be someday–but it should not be the only reason they feel tied to Amherst. Alums should not feel completely dissociated from the college simply because we got rid of the Jeff. Supporting the place where they learned, not just for what it was in the past, but for what it is now and what it is becoming will be important to think about moving forward.

nkhoudian20@amherst.edu

Report on Athletics Raises More Questions Than It Answers by Sam Wohlforth ’17

“The place of athletics at Amherst is fucking ridiculous.”  I was halfway through my interview with a professor about faculty concerns with the recent report on the place of athletics at Amherst when she blew my hair back with this line.  I looked up from my notebook.  I expected professors to be frustrated with the failures of the athletic and admissions departments–the report itself points out some real problems with athletics at Amherst, and recommends several reforms–but not to this degree.  “The report is vague and biased,” she said, and the letter from Biddy appended to the beginning of the report is “even more of a gloss of something vague and biased to begin with.”  

Continue reading Report on Athletics Raises More Questions Than It Answers by Sam Wohlforth ’17

International Students Face Job Uncertainties, by Katherine Stanton ’18

As spring semester approaches, many Amherst students are hoping to land a summer internship or post-graduation job. While the job application process for all students is immensely stressful, international students are among the specific groups of students burdened with extra considerations for the future. In a time when immigration has focalized within political discussion, it’s incredibly important to consider how international students desiring to work in the States must navigate a complex immigration system.

Continue reading International Students Face Job Uncertainties, by Katherine Stanton ’18

A Statement From Amherst Men’s Cross Country

We, the members of the Amherst Men’s Cross Country Team, sincerely and deeply apologize to the entire Amherst community for the pain caused by our recently published remarks. There are no words to justify what was said and we are all responsible for the harm inflicted by our team’s comments. We are embarrassed and ashamed by what was said by some members of our team. We can never minimize the impact of these comments and sincerely apologize to the groups and individuals directly targeted. We aim to hold ourselves to high standards of respect, but we have fallen painfully short. Criticism is appropriate and deserved. These conversations have real consequences beyond members of our team, and we pledge to work with the Amherst community to change our team culture for the better.

Since the time emails were sent, our team has had conversations about what we need to do to improve. We still have a long way to go, and all current members of our team are committed to being a part of the solution to issues that have plagued us. As a team and as individuals we do not want to hide from any of this. We are all accountable for what has been said and how we improve in the future.

At this time, our team is looking at our individual roles in fostering a toxic culture, meeting with the specific groups who were directly impacted by the email contents, meeting with the athletic department, and reaching out to resources on campus that can best help us understand how we have affected others and what concrete steps we can take as a team.

Once again, we are deeply sorry and hope to work with the community moving forward. We pledge to ensure transparency and accountability in this process, and hope that this apology is the first step to regaining the trust of the many people we have hurt.

–Amherst Men’s Cross Country

Response from the authors of the initial article on this story:

We would caution the team against any attempt to make personal amends to those they targeted out of respect for those individuals. We hope that going forward the team will not seek absolution from those they targeted and will instead focus on internal change. As we worked on our reporting we were careful not to release any information that might identify the individuals who were targeted by the team. We thought about speaking with the targeted individuals to get their consent before releasing identifying information, but we chose not to because we recognized that they might not know that they were targeted. We were also aware that those individuals might be distraught or retraumatized if they were to find out they had been targeted, and our focus was always on the actions of the team.

We also believe it is worth noting that several of the individuals targeted are not members of the Amherst community. We therefore question the team’s decision to suggest that this matter is internal to Amherst.

We commend the men’s cross country team for responding to the racist and misogynist messages that have recently come to light.  

Men’s Cross Country Maintained Misogynistic, Racist Email Chain

by Daniel Ahn, Helen Mayer, and Sam Wohlforth

A current junior member of the Amherst cross-country team sent a team-wide email containing a list of women that described their sexual histories and supposed sexual proclivities next to their photographs on June 14, 2015. The list was directed to the first-year recruits who awaited matriculation to Amherst in the fall, and purported to introduce them to the “friends of Amherst (XC).”

In the email, the team member refers to one woman as “a walking STD,” and writes, “Everyone needs their meatslab,”referring to another. He describes a third woman – “Without being too mean, she is a stuck up, snobby, bitch; AKA the perfect formal date for the desperate members of our team.”

Continue reading Men’s Cross Country Maintained Misogynistic, Racist Email Chain

Editorial: After Men’s XC Emails, Examine All Athlete Spaces

by Helen Mayer, Sam Wohlforth, and Daniel Ahn

We were motivated to write this editorial because we believe that the national conversation started by Donald Trump’s “locker room talk” comments has added precious little to the conversation around sexual violence and athlete culture. Until recently, we had no reason to believe that the Amherst administration might be prepared to act on team-wide messages of the kind exchanged by the Harvard men’s soccer and cross country teams and Columbia men’s wrestling team. We obtained emails from a team-wide mailing list maintained by the Amherst men’s cross country team between June 2013 and August 2015 and found that the contents bear a striking resemblance to the Harvard and Columbia messages. Continue reading Editorial: After Men’s XC Emails, Examine All Athlete Spaces

Houses of the Future: Balancing Luxury and Utility by Monica Diaz ’20

To many, the idea of home automation belongs to the realm of science fiction. Nevertheless, this technology is appearing all around us. “Home automation” refers to the use of one or more computers to control basic home functions and features. These technologies have the capability to revolutionize the way in which we function in our natural environments, providing ease and luxury in our daily lives. On a more pressing note, these technologies also offer utility. With some work, the “smart home” may soon be adapted to provide more efficient and practical care for those who require assisted living.

Continue reading Houses of the Future: Balancing Luxury and Utility by Monica Diaz ’20